
A whale just opened an eight-figure short against Ethereum. The bet landed as October began with fresh catalysts and rising ETF flows. Traders now watch funding, basis, and depth as price leans on the $4,000 zone. Developer progress adds fuel, with upgrades lining up to cut costs and improve user experience. Seasonality favors crypto in October, yet macro risk can still sway momentum.
At the same time, BullZilla is gaining traction. The presale shows steady stage advances, active holders, and a transparent price ladder. On-chain checks back the project’s claims, while the website lays out tokenomics, burns, and staking. Interest grows when a presale keeps the numbers simple and verifiable. That mix puts BullZilla on watch lists during Ethereum’s Uptober setup.
A top trader just bet against Ethereum with millions on the line. That move landed as October opened with fresh catalysts, shifting flows, and renewed talk of an Uptober rally. This is not a routine blip. It is a stress test for sentiment, liquidity, and risk management across decentralized derivatives. At the same time, one altcoin keeps drawing interest for a simple reason. Its presale is posting clear, trackable milestones.

According to a newsroom-reviewed report, a high-ranking Hyperliquid trader opened an $18.64 million ETH short around $4,365.46. The position sits in profit if ETH drifts toward $4,000. It risks losses if price drives into the $4,600 to $4,800 area. The liquidation level appears far above spot, which hints at collateral structure and leverage design on the platform. That technical detail matters because it shapes squeeze risk and funding dynamics for everyone else on the book.
Ethereum entered October with rising attention from traditional finance and strong seasonal patterns across crypto. Barron’s highlighted green prints for major coins on October 1. The report linked gains to macro noise and the historical tendency for October to favor risk assets.
Institutions also weigh in. On October 2, Citigroup lifted its year-end Ether target to $4,500. The bank cited stronger ETF inflows and digital asset treasury demand, while trimming its Bitcoin view. Strategy desks track these revisions because they shape flows and hedging.
Ethereum’s core roadmap keeps moving. The Pectra upgrade activated on May 7, 2025, introducing account abstraction features, validator experience improvements, and support for Layer-2 scaling. Developers framed it as the biggest set of EIPs in a single upgrade to date. The goal is clear. Improve UX, raise safety for validators, and make L2 capacity cheaper and easier.
Engineers are not done. On October 1, developers confirmed that the Fusaka upgrade passed a key Holesky test. Two more test runs are on the calendar for mid and late October. After those, maintainers expect to lock a mainnet date. More blobs and data availability improvements would support cheaper throughput and better rollup economics. That matters for fees, revenue, and the developer experience across L2s.
Flows add another layer. Reports show ETF demand and staking deposits helped price reclaim the $4,000 area this week. The link between staking, supply sink, and price resilience is now familiar to market structure teams. As staking increases, liquid supply shrinks. That can dampen sell pressure during shocks. It can also magnify rallies when demand returns.
Clear indicators keep decisions grounded. The first is stake share. Beacon chain charts show a steady climb in staked ETH through 2025. Several industry summaries place the stake above 30 percent, or about 35 million ETH. That level reduces liquid float. It changes how quickly price responds to new demand. It also presses exchanges and market makers to manage inventory more carefully. Always validate live figures on a blockchain explorer before acting, since snapshots shift daily.
A second indicator is net issuance. After the Merge, and with EIP-1559 burns, Ethereum’s issuance dropped sharply versus proof of work. Analysts often describe periods when ETH supply turns deflationary during high on-chain activity. This does not guarantee price gains. It does tighten supply during usage spikes, which can support higher equilibrium prices when demand persists.
A third is upgrades and their timing. Pectra shipped in May. Fusaka progressed this week. Upgrade cadence supports developer confidence. It also signals ongoing cost improvements and UX gains. Price does not move on roadmaps alone. Yet roadmaps reduce uncertainty and attract builders who expand the app layer. That activity brings users and fees.
A fourth is macro sentiment. October often favors crypto, but macro risk can mute that rhythm. Recent coverage linked early-October gains to a weaker dollar and policy uncertainty. If rates stay higher for longer, risk assets can wobble. That tension explains why a whale might tilt short, even into a seasonally strong month.
In 2025, Bitcoin kept the top spot for institutional flows. Yet Ether’s product lineup widened with ETFs and tokenization pilots. That created a split regime. Bitcoin worked as the macro hedge. Ethereum worked as the programmable layer with consistent developer traction. Reports from research desks and media outlets show that adoption patterns vary by use case and geography, with the United States and India at the top of global adoption rankings. That matters because developer and user density shape where new liquidity forms.
Analysts also track exchange-traded products. They watch whether fund inflows offset miner or validator sales. They map staking entries and exits. They look at issuance and burn. Those mechanics feed into a 2025 view that sees Ethereum gaining strength as upgrades land and tokenization tests grow. Banks and asset managers take note when headlines cite ETF inflows and improved staking economics.
Price is a snapshot. Sentiment is a slope. Recent outlets showed Ether above $4,390 this week as deposit flows and ETF demand returned. That sits against a backdrop of large directional bets in perps. The mix can propel quick swings in both directions. For that reason, students, developers, and analysts should track funding, basis, and spot liquidity each day. Treat those as traffic signals for risk rather than hidden math.

When markets enter October strength, attention spreads to credible alternatives. The search pattern often reads the same. Investors look for clear roadmaps, consistent releases, audited contracts, and aligned incentives. They want simple narratives that map to on-chain proof. They prefer teams that avoid complex token games and show real demand. That is where one presale caught attention this week.
During ETH strength, beta trades perform best when they ride Ethereum’s network effects. Layer-2 tokens benefit from cheaper capacity. DeFi protocols gain volume. Meme assets win mindshare on culture. Yet each segment carries risk. Smart contracts can fail. Liquidity can vanish. Fees can rise with demand. With that in mind, presales deserve extra scrutiny. Audits, vesting, burn mechanics, and staking terms should be easy to verify on-chain. If a team pushes only slogans, step back.

Price targets change with flows and upgrades. MarketWatch and other outlets discussed how Pectra improved user experience and validator design. Critics doubted that one upgrade alone would power a full comeback. Bulls argued that stack improvements compound over time. In October, developers pushed Fusaka closer to mainnet. That sequence supports a constructive 2025 view, but it still depends on demand and macro. Use predictions as scenarios, not promises.
The hyper-visible short shows that top traders prepare for both paths. If ETH rallies, shorts can exit or hedge. If ETH slips, profits can scale quickly. The broader lesson is simple. Preparation and liquidity control outcomes. That applies to majors like Ethereum and to smaller names trying to earn attention.
No single asset owns that title. Ethereum offers the deepest developer base and the widest app surface. It benefits from upgrades that reduce costs and simplify accounts. It also lives inside a macro regime that can lift or sink risk. Careful readers should track staking share, ETF flows, L2 usage, and upgrade timelines. Those four pillars explain most of the 2025 story so far.
BullZilla ($BZIL) runs on Ethereum and promotes a progressive price engine that steps up the token price after fixed time or funding milestones. The team advertises a burn pool before each stage change and a staking program with a stated APY. The website links to an audit page and presents tokenomics that are simple to parse. Readers should always verify claims against an explorer, the published audit, and the contract address before any purchase.
| Metric | Value |
| Current Stage | 5th (Roar Drop Incoming) |
| Phase | 1st |
| Current Price | $0.00011241 |
| Presale Tally | Over $760,000 raised |
| Token Holders | Over 2,400 |
| Tokens Sold | Over 30,000,000,000 |
| Current ROI vs Listing ($0.00527) | 4,589.44% |
| ROI until Stage 5A for earliest joiners | 1,854.95% |
| Approx. allocation for $1,000 | 8.896 million BZIL |
| Next step-up | 5.92% to $0.00011907 at Stage 5B |
Buying presale tokens should feel simple. The project explains a connect-wallet flow on its site. A user selects a supported wallet, checks the current stage price, and confirms the transaction. The site also promotes a referral program with a bonus to both parties. Staking details, burns, and vesting are documented on the project pages. Before any transaction, confirm the official contract and audit link, and test with a small amount first. That habit reduces avoidable errors.

Ethereum faces a large short from a trader who is willing to test the bid. Developers keep shipping upgrades that improve accounts, validators, and data. Institutions continue to adjust targets as flows shift into ETFs and treasuries. A presale like BullZilla earns attention when it shows clear mechanics and on-chain proof. The path forward rewards projects that publish, deliver, and verify. The same logic applies to traders. Plan both sides. Respect liquidity. Track the signals that matter.

Follow BZIL on X (Formerly Twitter)
It shows that a top trader expects near-term weakness or wants hedge exposure. The size can move funding and basis on a venue like Hyperliquid.
Upgrades improve UX, costs, and capacity. They do not guarantee price gains. They help developers build and users stay, which can support long-term value.
Watch staked share, ETF inflows, Layer-2 usage, and upgrade timelines. These pillars explain most of the trend.
History favors October, yet macro risk can override seasonality. Reports cited early-October gains tied to macro headlines.
It runs an order book architecture with high performance and non-custodial design. Builders monitor its data to measure depth and latency.
Use the project website for links to the audit and tokenomics. Validate addresses on an explorer before sending funds.
Chainalysis placed India and the United States near the top. Adoption patterns help explain where new liquidity forms.
Ethereum entered October with a headline short on Hyperliquid and a steady cadence of core upgrades. Pectra shipped in May and Fusaka passed a major test this week, pointing to cheaper data and better smart account UX. Institutions adjusted targets as ETF and staking flows supported a base over $4,000. The $18.64 million ETH short highlights how funding, basis, and order book depth can swing fast. In parallel, BullZilla’s Ethereum-based presale gained traction with a progressive price engine, audited contracts, and visible burn and staking mechanics. Readers should track staking share, ETF inflows, Layer-2 activity, and upgrade timelines, while verifying presale claims on-chain. The market rewards proof, not hype.
Disclaimer and Risk Warning
This article is a sponsored press release and is for informational purposes only. Crypto News Land does not endorse or is responsible for any content, quality, products, advertising, products, accuracy or any other materials on this article. This content does not reflect the views of Crypto News Land, nor is it intended to be used for legal, tax, investment, or financial advice. Crypto News Land will not be held responsible for image copyright matters. Readers are advised to always do your own research before making any significant decisions.