• Sam Bankman-Fried, the former FTX CEO, is appealing his 25-year prison sentence, arguing he was presumed guilty and denied a fair trial.
• His defense team claims he was “never presumed innocent” and unfairly targeted, arguing FTX’s solvency and challenging the narrative that portrayed him as a thief, as they seek to overturn his conviction and 25-year sentence.
• The possibility of a presidential pardon for Sam Bankman-Fried remains uncertain, with speculation fueled by Trump’s recent pardons of crypto figures like Ross Ulbricht and Changpeng Zhao. 

After the collapse of FTX, the former CEO, Sam Bankman-Fried was convicted of seven felony counts. Presently, he is in federally serving a 25-year prison term. His lawyers have filed a motion for a new trial at the appellate court arguing his innocence or at least a reduction of his sentence. The court will decide on his appeal which is due to be held on November 4th.

Allegations of Trial Bias

According to Bankman-Fried’s defense team, their client was “never presumed innocent” and that he was unfairly targeted in the trial. They further argue that the prosecutor’s story describing FTX as a company that had run its course and Bankman-Fried as a thief was not only incorrect but also that it had misled the jury in reaching the verdict.

The defense has indicated that FTX’s insolvency is disproven by the recent emergence of new documents which demonstrate that FTX had enough assets to pay back its customers.

Also Read: FTX Taps Payoneer to Help Distribute Funds to Eligible Customers

The Appeal Process

In the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, attorneys representing Sam Bankman-Fried will make their oral argument to contest the conviction and the sentencing. The appeal mainly concentrates on two issues.

One determining whether FTX was actually insolvent when it collapsed, and if the trial judge, District Judge Lewis Kaplan, had made procedural errors during the court proceedings. The judge will decide what comes next for Bankman-Fried in this case.

Also Read: Sam Bankman-Fried’s Prison Term Reduced to 21 Years

Potential Outcomes

Winning​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌ in an appeal court may see a new trial being arranged for Bankman-Fried or the reduction of his sentence. However, a negative decision on the appeal will mean that Bankman-Fried continues with his prison term, and most probably, until its completion. Besides the fate of the crypto mogul, the result of the case would influence the regulation of the burgeoning market and whether there would be a need for ​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌it.

Also Read: Trump Denies Binance Pardon: Is It A New Era for Crypto Regulation In 2025?

Speculation about the Pardon

Some people speculate that if President Trump favors pardoning crypto figures who support him, then a pardon for Bankman-Fried may be in the offing.

Just​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌ the idea of a pardon, without any official statement, complicates things even more. Situations such as that of Bankman-Fried, the headline-making ones which garner most of the attention, are the ones that will determine the overall mood of the regulation of the crypto market.

Also Read: Donald Trump Pardons Binance Founder CZ – Crypto’s Explosive Future Unravelled in 2025

In Conclusion

The motion filed by Sam Bankman-Fried to reverse the guilty verdict and the consequent incarceration is a pivotal event in the world of cryptocurrency. This hearing will be a domino effect, not only of interest to the stakeholders and regulators of the industry but also to the public, as the consequences will affect the latter too.

What the court decides on will not only influence the outcome of the case but also set an example for the next cases involving crypto executives and supervisory authorities. As the industry’s impact grows, the call for transparency and consistency in the application of regulation is louder than ​‍​‌‍​‍‌​‍​‌‍​‍‌ever.

Also Read: Sam Bankman-Fried Claims FTX Was Never Insolvent as Repayments Exceed $8B