
U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren has renewed her call for stronger cryptocurrency regulations. She warned that current laws leave room for corruption, economic instability, and criminal misuse. She said the existing framework favors industry interests and lacks safeguards to protect consumers or prevent abuse.
Warren highlighted the need to restrict elected officials from trading or engaging in crypto-related activities. She linked her concerns to President Donald Trump’s ties to the industry. She pointed to risks that policies could be shaped for personal or political gain rather than public interest. She also urged for measures to stop the use of digital assets by criminals, including terrorists and drug traffickers.
The senator’s comments come as U.S. lawmakers move forward with long-awaited crypto regulations. In July, the House passed three major bills. These include the GENIUS Stablecoin Act, the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, and the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act.
The legislation marked the first coordinated push to define rules for the industry. These moves followed months of debate and opposition from certain lawmakers, including Warren. She had previously criticized the bills as ineffective.
Warren’s latest remarks have drawn mixed responses from the crypto sector. Some critics said her stance risks slowing innovation. Others noted she did not reject the idea of regulation entirely. Instead, she focused on shaping upcoming rules to address market structure and investor protections. Industry observers said this approach reflects a shift from outright opposition to targeted reform.
Warren’s concerns align with critics who question Trump’s growing involvement in crypto. The former president has promoted the U.S. as a leader in digital assets. At the same time, his personal investments in crypto-related ventures have expanded. These include memecoin projects and World Liberty Financial.
Reports show his earnings from such ventures exceed $57 million. Analysts say this raises possible conflicts of interest between policy decisions and private financial gains.
The debate over U.S. crypto policy remains active. Supporters of stronger oversight argue it will protect the financial system and prevent abuse. Opponents warn that excessive rules could stifle growth in a sector seen as vital for future innovation. The coming months will test whether lawmakers can create rules that balance security with economic opportunity.